We’re living in a day when personal experience has been elevated
above everything else as the final criterion of right and wrong. Just think of
all of the people who try to justify themselves on the basis of what and how
they feel. Divorce is routinely excused on the basis of a married couple’s no
longer feeling like they are in love. We are told that homosexuality should be
embraced as a moral good because some homosexuals report having felt an
attraction to the same sex from a young age. Even many professing Christians
make their decisions about right and wrong based on how they feel.
It’s hard to have a discussion with someone who makes their
experience the final arbiter of reality. Many people embrace the old adage that
“a person with an experience is never at the mercy of a person with an
argument.” But it this really true?
Ultimately, we have to disagree with this assertion, but not
because experience is not a valuable tutor. It can help us connect theory to
practice and abstract concepts to concrete situations. It assists us in sifting through the nuances of living in this complex world.
Experience can be a valuable asset when it is used correctly. There are even some experiences that seem to
prove that experience trumps argumentation.
I think of the example of Roger Bannister. Before 1954, many
people argued that no human being could run a mile in under four minutes.
Bannister broke that record, proving by experience that the argument
was invalid. The problem is not that experience can never outweigh an
argument; we know from the history of science that the experience of empirical
investigation has often overturned prevailing arguments.
The problem is the idea that the person with an experience is never at the
mercy of a person with an argument. In many cases, sound argument does indeed trump
experience. This is particularly true when the debate concerns personal
experience versus a sound understanding of the Word of God.
Too often many Christians subject the Word of God to their
experience. When our experience conflicts with the Word of God, we set aside
the Scriptures. We might take refuge in public opinion or the most recent
psychological studies. We allow the common experience of people around us to
become normative, denying the wisdom and authority of God in favor of the collective
experience of others, especially those who have a title, such as pastor, doctor
or expert.
But we have to admit that at times we all know that experience
is often a good teacher. But experience
is never the best teacher. God, of course, is the best teacher. Why? Because He
instructs us from the perspective of eternity and from the riches of
His omniscience.
Sometimes we try to cover up our reliance on experience with
more orthodox-sounding language. I can’t
tell you the number of times I’ve heard Christians tell me that the Holy Spirit
led them to do things Scripture clearly forbids or that God gave them peace
about their decision to act in a way that is clearly contrary to the law of
God. But that’s blasphemous slander against the Spirit, as if He would ever
countenance sin. It’s bad enough to blame the devil for our own decisions, but
we put ourselves in grave danger when we appeal to the Spirit to justify
our transgressions.
One of the most powerful devices of
manipulation we’ve ever designed is to claim that we have experienced the
Spirit’s approval of our actions. How can anyone dare contradict us if we claim
divine authority for what we want to do? The result is that we end up silencing
any questions about our behavior. But Scripture tells us that the Holy Spirit
leads us to holiness, not to sin, and if the Spirit inspired the Scriptures,
any experience we have that suggests we can go against biblical teaching cannot
be from Him.
As long as we live on this side of heaven, we must deal with the
fallenness of our bodies and souls. Seeking to make our experience
determinative of right and wrong means repeating Adam and Eve’s sin. Why did
they disobey the Lord? Because they trusted their experience that told them
“the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that
the tree was to be desired to make one wise” (Gen. 3:6). They
ignored the promises and warnings God revealed to them regarding the fruit of
the forbidden tree. Experience can and should teach us, but it can never be the
final arbiter of right and wrong. That role belongs to our Creator alone, and
His Word gives us the standards by which we must live.
No comments:
Post a Comment