A Biblical Response to the Goals of the Illuminati, Part 2

In the year 1770, Mayer Amschel Rothschild recruited Jewish-born, Adam Weishaupt, an apostate Jesuit-trained professor of canon law, to revise and modernize Illuminism, the worship of Satan, with the objective of world domination and the imposition of  the Luciferian ideology “upon what would remain of the human race” after a final orchestrated social-cataclysm. 

In 1773, Mayer summoned twelve wealthy men to Frankfort and asked them to pool their resources, then presented a plan that would enable them to gain control of the wealth, natural resources and manpower of the entire world.

Weishaupt, financed by Rothschild, had begun infiltrating the well-established Continental Order of Freemasons with this satanical doctrine. Weishaupt recruited 2,000 agents, “the most intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, science, finance, and industry.” Weishaupt instructed these well-paid individuals on the best methods of bribing, manipulating and controlling people and the press.

Weishaupt reorganized the Illuminati by May 1, 1776 with twenty-five goals. The word Illuminati, derived from Lucifer, means “holder of the light.” The plan deceptively uses the phrase “peace on earth” and necessitates the destruction of all existing governments and religions through a process of “dividing the masses into opposing camps in ever increasing numbers on political, social, economic, and other issues.” People would “fight and weaken themselves and gradually destroy national governments and religious institutions.”

Part 1 dealt with the first goal. Here we now look at the second goal which is to -

2. Preach Liberalism.

The idea is this:  Political freedom is an idea, not a fact. In order to usurp political power, all that is necessary is to preach 'liberalism,' and the electorates will give up more and more power to the conspirators. 

To the RCE (Ruling Class Elite, used interchangeably with the Illuminati), political freedom exists only in peoples’ minds.

Now it is important to understand that term the “liberalism” as it was used back in the 18^th century did not mean what it does so today. Liberalism essentially is the belief that man is good and that his freedoms and the necessary changes to protect his freedoms should be derived from government, through the political process, and even by man himself.

Today, we tend to think of a liberal as a “progressive,” one who is adapting to new ideas and putting them into operation through education and politics.

Preaching liberalism has its advantages in the following ways:

1.  It preaches better than it works.

Just pause and look around at how the practice of liberalism works.  Not too well.  Yet, it got Obama elected twice. He preached liberalism and the people bought it. But he was not able to deliver on his promises which accounts for his low approval rating.

So what do we need? A change! Put the authority of the president back into the hands of a Conservative, but be sure he does a good job of abusing his power and at the same time looking stupid and out of touch along the way. Then take it away from the Conservative and put it back into the authority of a Liberal. With these changes, on a very subtle basis, more and more of the people’s liberties are taken away in order to satisfy them.  But the people tend not to notice it.

2.  Liberalism tends to work well apart from the idea of the existence of God.

Because there is a strong belief in the goodness of man, liberals for the most part, do not believe in a God that they need to submit their lives to. Now they may believe in a supreme being, but not enough to believe that this supreme being expects absolute obedience. Man by himself can solve his own problems and do just fine without God.

3.  Liberalism changes because man’s ideas change.

Liberals are relativists.  Truth is not absolute. Government relays what is true. Society relays what is true.  People relay what they consider to be true. This has an awesome appeal to people. 

Therefore, the preaching of liberalism as a goal for the RCE was chosen.  While they use evil to tempt man to weaken himself, they preach liberalism to give him hope.

What will result from this is total disillusionment.  When the populace comes to the place of being in total disarray, then the RCE will step in with their ultimate solution – a Luciferian Global Government.

Biblical Response:  Man’s only hope for change is transformation.  Man must be changed from the inside out.  Liberals believes that if you change a man’s environment, you can change the man. This is not true. Man may go through a superficial change on the outside, but he is still the same on the inside.

The biblical response is to preach the gospel or the saving work of Christ in which He became the sinner’s substitute on the cross. When a sinner trusts in Jesus for salvation, God takes the sins of the sinner and puts them on His Son; then He takes the righteousness of His Son and puts it on the sinner (see 2 Cor. 5:21).  This results in transformation.  The difference between transformation and change is simply this: With transformation a sinner is reborn into a saint. Whereas with change the sinner remains the same in his or her nature.  Behavioral change does not constitute a nature change.

Watch closely, liberalism will rule for a season, then people will get sick of it. Then conservatism will takes its place for a season then people will get sick of that. With each change that occurs back and forth between liberalism and conservatism, the liberties of the populace diminishes and the level of frustration increases.

This is all planned by the RCE.

Goal #3 – Next